| branshew |
01-11-2010 09:36 PM |
Re: Concealed Carry Protocal~
My post wasn't meant to "gripe" or "complain." He has valid points and I'm not denying that, but other images and examples could have helped him make his point to the same effect. I have some close ties to that incident so I may be somewhat biased.
Quote:
Originally Posted by TruthInOurTime
(Post 2119265)
I don't see how this exploits (To make use of selfishly or unethically) any situation.
|
To exploit doesn't always have to be unethical, but to make productive use of or to further his cause which is an acepted definition of exploitation. He is obvoiusly pro carry (as am I). His intro uses the images from the incident at Tech as a lead in to his "you have to decide whether or not to break the carry rules." He briefly discusses that there may be consequences for breaking the rules, but the images, (along with his commentary) are presented in a way to suggest breaking the rules or leaning in that direction. The Tech images are graphical examples used to further his point in which case it seems to fit the definition of exploitation to me.
Would his message have the same effect if the intro used footage of kittens playing with a ball of yarn?
Quote:
Originally Posted by TruthInOurTime
(Post 2119265)
Plus being 9 minutes in he hasn't said anything about VT and has only mentioned Ft Hood so far.
|
Actually somewhere in the 8-9 minute range he makes a comment on how the VT campus has a no-carry rule. (I believe that he calls it "stupid.")
Quote:
Originally Posted by TruthInOurTime
(Post 2119265)
PS you spelled tyrannis wrong.
|
Duly noted and corrected.
|